According to Quantum Mechanics, nothing at the subatomic scale can really be said to exist until it is observed. Each of our now's, are like a succession of snapshots, that we chose with our free will to form probabilities, to make our reality. Space and Time are illusions, according to scientific principles. Yes, since we live in a static, (which means a fixed or stationary), Multiverse. In particular the introduction of sometimes contradictory models explains how physics works the evolution of ideas. The movie is a bit outdated with its facts. While the choice of topics is well balanced and gives you an interesting introduction into the modern view of our universe. I would rather have the movie address the subject using examples of Hawking's life rather two different subjects trying to share screen time. The theories come out of nowhere like the Big Bang and leaves while we move back to the story of Hawking's personal life, then back to another theory and then back to the story. The movie doesn't mix the story of his life with that of his research that well. While the movie gives a great insight of the life of Hawking and how he end up in the wheelchair. Although they share a title, the film is a biographical study of Hawking, and not a filmed version of the book. A Brief History of Time was supposed to explain a range of subjects in cosmology, including the Big Bang, black holes and other super-string theory, to the non-specialist thinker, but the movie doesn't follow that. It should had the subtitled 'From the Big Bang to Black Holes') added to it. The movie forget to add the subtitled in the book in which the movie based on. For a title 'a brief history of time', it's rather talks about anything about time at all. It's more a biography than a document about the science behind time. Most of the movie is about Stephen Hawking's life rather than Stephen Hawking's ideas.

A brief history of time book review